February 2009

February 15, 2009

How To Take Advantage Of The Tax Law Changes

With the economic times getting tougher, we all need to find ways to save money. The recent tax law changes may put extra money in your pocket when you file your federal income tax this year.  For example, If you’re not a first time homebuyer but your last home purchase was more than 3 years ago you may qualify for a new $7,500 tax credit for first-time home buyers.

Technically, it’s a tax-free loan that has to be repaid over 15 years but it’s still a great deal. Some new tax breaks have qualifying dates that don’t follow the calendar year. The home buyer credit applies only to purchases between April 9, 2008, and June 30 of this year. And many have income restrictions. For example, the home buyer credit is phased out at modified-adjusted incomes of $150,000 for married couples or $95,000 for singles.

Here are some other tax law changes that may affect your 2008 federal income tax return.

Kiddie tax
The “kiddie tax,” which taxes a child’s investment income beyond $1,800 at the parent’s tax rate, now covers some children until they turn 24. “People used to try to pay for college by transferring appreciated assets to their children to pay college expenses,” said Mark Luscombe, principal tax analyst at CCH, a tax publisher in Riverwoods, Ill. The children could then sell those assets and pay far less tax than their parents would have owed. “Now that no longer works,” Luscombe said. The rule applies to children who are enrolled in college or a trade school and who are still dependent on their parents for most of their financial support.

Capital gains
Low-income households will pay zero tax on capital gains from assets they’ve owned at least a year. To qualify, your wages must place you in the bottom two income tax brackets, which cover taxable incomes up to $65,100 for married couples filing joint returns, or $32,550 for singles. Previously, people in these brackets had to pay a 5 percent tax on such long-term capital gains. Most higher-earning taxpayers will continue to pay a 15 percent tax on capital gains.

Luscombe said he thinks this change explains why the kiddie tax was extended to older offspring. Parents would have had even more incentive to shift investments over to kids who would pay zero tax on the gains. “Taxpayers really like the concept of a zero percent tax rate,” he noted.

Standard deduction plus
Nearly two-thirds of taxpayers claim the standard deduction instead of itemizing, according to the IRS. This year those using the standard deduction can claim an extra amount for state and local property taxes. Married couples filing jointly can claim up to $1,000 extra; singles can claim $500. This will benefit people such as retirees who have paid off their mortgages and don’t have enough deductions aside from their property taxes to make itemizing worthwhile.

Taxpayers also can claim an extra amount on top of their standard deduction to account for losses suffered from a federally declared disaster.

Forgiven mortgage debt
If you lost your home to foreclosure or a short sale (with the lender agreeing to accept sales proceeds that are short of what’s owed on the mortgage), that unpaid debt is technically considered income to you. For the tax years 2007 through 2012, the government is waiving any tax liability on that phantom income. The lender will send you — and the IRS — a copy of Form 1099-C, “Cancellation of Debt,” reporting that forgiven debt as income. To make sure you are not taxed on the amount, you will have to file Form 982, “Reduction of Tax Attributes Due to Discharge of Indebtedness.” (Forms can be downloaded free from http://www.IRS.gov.) If you’ve lost a home to foreclosure, be sure the bank and IRS have your current address (notify the IRS by mailing in Form 8822) so you receive important notices promptly.

This year-old change to the tax laws will affect more people this year, thanks to soaring foreclosure rates. Forgiven debt on vacation homes and rental properties is still taxable as if it were income.

Recovery rebate credit
Remember how last year’s economic stimulus payment arrived in your mailbox without you even requesting it? The credits were as high as $1,200 for married couples, $600 for singles and $300 for children, and you were automatically eligible if your income met the program’s limits. To get the stimulus checks in hand quickly, the IRS did the math for you, looking back to your 2007 reported income to estimate whether you would be eligible for all or part of the credit.

Now that you know how much you actually earned in 2008, it’s time to tidy up that math with this year’s tax return. If you got less than the full credit last year, you may qualify for the remainder now. Generally that will happen if your income in 2008 was lower than in 2007, or if you added another child to your household, who qualifies for a $300 credit.

This is already causing confusion with 2008 returns. The IRS reported that about 15 percent of people who filed in January made a mistake regarding the recovery rebate credit. To do it right, you will need to fill out a worksheet that comes with your tax return to calculate the dollar amount of rebate credit (if any) you are due. To fill out the worksheet correctly, you will you need to know exactly how much you received last year.

You do not have to pay tax on your economic stimulus payment, nor do you have to give any back if the IRS sent out a check that was too big in light of your actual 2008 income.

For more information on the tax changes for 2008 you can go to the IRS website at http://www.IRS.gov.

source: Washington Post

Filed under Taxes by

Permalink Print Comment

February 13, 2009

Is It An Economic Stimulus Or Economic Stabilization Plan?

It appears that a compromise in the economic stimulus plan could be reached as early as Friday and signed into law by President Obama on Presidents Day. But the question is will the Obama economic stimulus plan do enough to get consumers spending or is it a short term solution to get us through the recession instead of getting us out of it?

“I think (doing) nothing would have been better,” said Ed Yardeni, an investment analyst who’s usually an optimist, in an interview with McClatchy Newspapers. He argued that the economic stimulus plan fails to provide the right incentives to spur spending.

“It’s unfocused. That is my problem. It is a lot of money for a lot of nickel-and-dime programs. I would have rather had a lot of money for (promoting purchase of) housing and autos. … Most of this plan is really, I think, aimed at stabilizing the situation and helping people get through the recession, rather than getting us out of the recession. They are actually providing less short-term stimulus by cutting back, from what I understand, some of the tax credits.”

The House and Senate negotiators have narrowed the differences between their economic stimulus plans. In doing so they scrapped a large tax credit for buying automobiles that would have caused positive ripple effects across the manufacturing sector. They settled instead on letting purchasers of new vehicles deduct from their federal taxes the state and local sales taxes on the cars they bought. Will this economic stimulus line item really incite people to spend?

The exception to this is for buyers of plug-in hybrids, cars that run off a battery that can be charged at home or in the office. Buyers of these vehicles, available in very limited supply, could get a tax credit of up to $9,100.

A Republican-backed proposal that would have provided a $15,000 tax credit to first-time homebuyers also was scaled back dramatically. Instead, the compromise provides first-time homebuyers a tax credit of up to $8,000, and it doesn’t have to be repaid over the life of the mortgage. Incentives already in place offer buyers a $7,500 credit that must be repaid, so the bill is an improvement, but short of what many economists think is necessary.

Another reason that some analysts frown on the stimulus is the social spending it includes on things such as the Head Start program for disadvantaged children and aid to NASA for climate-change research. Both may be worthy efforts, but they aren’t aimed at delivering short-term boosts to economic activity.

“All this is 25 years of government expansion jammed into one bill and sold as stimulus,” said Brian Riedl, the director of budget analysis for the Heritage Foundation, a conservative policy research group.

The exception to this is for buyers of plug-in hybrids, cars that run off a battery that can be charged at home or in the office. Buyers of these vehicles, available in very limited supply, could get a tax credit of up to $9,100.

A Republican-backed proposal that would have provided a $15,000 tax credit to first-time homebuyers also was scaled back dramatically. Instead, the compromise provides first-time homebuyers a tax credit of up to $8,000, and it doesn’t have to be repaid over the life of the mortgage. Incentives already in place offer buyers a $7,500 credit that must be repaid, so the bill is an improvement, but short of what many economists think is necessary.

Another reason that some analysts frown on the stimulus is the social spending it includes on things such as the Head Start program for disadvantaged children and aid to NASA for climate-change research. Both may be worthy efforts, but they aren’t aimed at delivering short-term boosts to economic activity.

“All this is 25 years of government expansion jammed into one bill and sold as stimulus,” said Brian Riedl, the director of budget analysis for the Heritage Foundation, a conservative policy research group.

Others shared a similarly dim view. In a brief on the stimulus compromise, William Galston, a senior fellow at the center-left Brookings Institution and a former Clinton White House adviser, warned Thursday that a bank-rescue plan being finalized will make the $789 billion look like “pocket change.”

“While the stimulus bill is a necessary condition for economic stabilization and recovery, it is hardly sufficient,” Galston wrote. “As the lesson of Japan in the 1990s shows, fiscal stimulus without financial rescue yields stagnation – at best.”

Galston further wrote: ” … Serious observers believe that recovery cannot begin until we acknowledge that losses in the financial system amount to some trillions of dollars, rendering many institutions insolvent. The temptation will be to muddle along, hoping that these institutions can gradually regain strength without putting massive amounts of taxpayers’ money at risk. If we go down that road, we are likely to end up with zombie banks whose balance sheets are riddled with near-worthless investments – banks that cannot lend to credit-worthy customers and who cannot trust one another.”

With the economy in a tailspin, doing nothing isn’t an option, however.

“Something is better than nothing, and bigger was better than smaller in terms of the stimulus needed,” said Chris Varvares, president of prominent forecaster Macroeconomic Advisers in St. Louis. “The economy needs a fiscal jolt.”

Even some proponents of a stimulus are disappointed, however. Harvard University economist Martin Feldstein, a former adviser to President Ronald Reagan, was an early supporter. He said that government is now the only engine left to spark economic activity, but he said that the compromise falls short of what’s needed.

“If the choice is between the current bill and an improved bill, I would say wait and improve the bill,” Feldstein told CNBC on Wednesday after the compromise was announced. “I am disappointed with the structure of this bill.”

At the end of the say, both the Senate and House will compromise on the obama economic stimulus plan becasue the government economic stimulus is the last car left in town to “jump-start” the economy – and Congress is the “cables”.

source: Kansas City Star

Filed under Taxes by

Permalink Print Comment

February 9, 2009

Tax Prep Competition Is Good News For Taxpayers

Tax season usually heats up once that Groundhog Day is here. That’s usually the time you start getting your 2008 income tax information your income sources. 

But there is still two months yet before the deadline but time does fly. Before you know it you’re scrambling to get your federal income tax return done.

Filing one’s taxes electronically seemed like a novelty 10 years ago but accounts for almost six out of 10 returns today.

For the 2007 tax year that taxpayers filed a year ago, the Internal Revenue Service received almost 90 million by way of electronic filing out of a total 155.5 million returns.

And almost 27 million returns were filed from home computers, an increase of 19 percent from the previous year’s total of 22.6 million.

The options for free e-filing are increasing as well, said IRS spokeswoman Lea Crusberg.

For the 2008 tax year, which taxpayers will file by this year’s April 15 deadline, people with adjusted gross income of $54,000 or less – about 70 percent of all taxpayers – are eligible for free filing through the IRS in a partnership with some software manufacturers.

Last year, almost 4.8 million returns were sent through free-file, an increase of 24 percent compared with the previous year’s 3.9 million free-filed returns.

Federal Income Tax refunds are available in as few as 10 days from filing if the taxpayer provides the IRS with direct-deposit information.

Another route taxpayers might choose is through a paid tax preparer who also provides refund anticipation loans. That means the preparer will provide you with most of what your expected refund is for a fee.

The IRS said another benefit of its e-filing system is taxpayers can file now and if they owe money, pay later – up to the deadline of April 15.

“The IRS does not charge taxpayers to e-file their completed returns, but some tax preparers and software manufacturers may charge a fee. However, this year a number of large software companies are waiving this additional fee,” the IRS said.

E-filed tax returns are encrypted and taxpayers will receive an acknowledgement within 48 hours that the IRS has accepted the return.

The IRS also said that e-filed returns have an error rate of 1 percent compared with 20 percent for paper-filed returns.

So take advantage of free-filing federal income tax if you qualify. But if you don’t, take advantage of the online tax prep companies – in most cases, they are cheaper than going to an accountant.
source: beaumontenterprises.com

Filed under Taxes by

Permalink Print Comment