Its a rare occurrence when Democrats and Republicans agree on an issue. But on the issue of a particular Obama health care tax requirement, both sides agree that it could hurt businesses.

As reported by CBS News, Republicans in the Senate want to repeal a part of President Obama’s health care reforms they say place undue burden on businesses — and so do, apparently, Democrats.

Senate Democrats, led by Florida Sen. Bill Nelson, introduced on Thursday a measure to roll back a provision of the health care reforms that requires businesses to fill out more tax forms, the Hill reports.

Republicans had already introduced a plan to repeal the provision, and the measure was gaining support — including the support of one Democrat, moderate Sen. Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas.

The provision in question requires businesses to fill out a 1099 form with the IRS once the goods it purchases from another business in the span of a year exceed $600. It does not create a new tax, but simply requiring businesses to fill out the paperwork would generate approximately $17 billion over 10 years, the nonpartisan Congressional Budge Office estimates.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said this week the provision would create “an enormous amount of paperwork and complexity” for businesses, the Hill reports. Republicans are pointing to the new requirement as an example of how the president’s policies hurt business.

Given that repealing the provision would leave the government $17 billion short, the Republican proposal would cut billions of dollars in preventive health care services, according to the Hill.

By contrast, the Democratic proposal would scale back the filing requirement — only requiring businesses with more than 25 employees to fill out a 1099 after purchasing $5,000 worth of goods. To make up for the lost revenue, the Democratic measure would reportedly eliminate a tax break for large oil companies.

The Senate is slated to take a procedural vote on the Republican bill on Sept. 14, according to the Hill, and subsequently take up the Democratic alternative as an amendment.

Both Democrats and Republicans in the House also want to repeal the provision, but they failed to pass a bill to do so last week, because of differences of opinion over how to make up for the $17 billion lost.

Meanwhile, some states continue to challenge more significant portions of the health care reforms, such as the individual mandate — the requirement that all Americans acquire health care. A district judge this week denied the White House’s request to dismiss a lawsuit against the requirement. The Virginia General Assembly passed legislation this year exempting state residents from the federal coverage mandate, and the Virginia Attorney General filed suit against the federal law. Several other state attorneys general have filed a separate lawsuit challenging the federal law.

Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, a longtime liberal advocate for health care reform, predicted on MSNBC today that the individual mandate would be taken off the law books by 2014, when most of the reforms will be in place.

“Academically you want a mandate. The American people aren’t going to put up with a mandate,” Dean said. “I made this prediction before and I’m going to make it again: by the time this thing goes into effect in 2014, I think the mandate will be gone either through the courts or because it’s unpopular. You don’t need it.”

Even in the rare instance when both parties agree on a measure, they fail in passing it into law.

For once, can the House and Senate put politics aside and do the right thing?

source: cbs.com

Don’t look to your tax planner for help in preparing a 2010 tax strategy, at least not until Congress quits the political games and resolves the issue on tax cuts.

At the end of 2010, tax cuts enacted during the Bush years (2001 and 2003) are scheduled to expire, which will increase federal income tax rates for some Americans. Also at stake are taxes on dividends and capital gains, as well as tax credits and deductions.

Most Democrats and Republicans agree the middle class should not have to face tax hikes. But what about high-earners, families with income above $250,000 and singles above $200,000? Therein lies the battle.

The Obama administration favors allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire for wealthier Americans. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner this week argued the Administration plan would raise billions for the government with minimal impact on the economy.

“The top 2% are the least likely to spend those tax cuts, certainly not in comparison to the 98% of Americans who make less than $250,000 per-year,” said Geithner.

Republicans, though, are firmly opposed to the Administration plan. “We don’t believe anybody should face a tax hike, particularly in a recession,” said Don Stewart, press secretary for Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

“It’s clear they want to hold hostage tax cuts for the middle class for their desire for more tax cuts for the wealthy,” countered Jim Manley, spokesman for Democratic Senate Leader Harry Reid.

As the tax rate deadline ticks, professional tax planners are growing impatient.

“They’re dysfunctional,” complained Evan Snapper, financial advisor with Anchin Block & Anchin. “It’s terrible. It’s a political game that’s hurting the country.”

Usually accountants advise clients to defer income and investment gains until the following year — why owe taxes now when you can put them off?

But the possibility of higher tax rates in 2011 calls that logic into question.

“It’s tax planning turned on its head,” said Doug Flynn, a certified financial planner at Flynn Zito Capital Management.

Because of the uncertainty, planners can’t yet advise clients whether to sell real estate, stocks and bonds or to convert traditional Individual Retirement Accounts into Roth IRAs, which requires payment of taxes on investment gains.

“It’s putting us almost in a standstill. We’re trying to get our ammunition ready, but we’re not certain what ammunition to load,” said Steven Bandini, a certified public accountant at Zapken & Loeb.

And for entrepreneurs who have to worry about both business and personal income taxes, it’s added an extra layer of uncertainty on top of the sluggish economy.

New York business owner Ellen Donath says she’s won’t even consider hiring additional staff, until the issue is resolved because she’s unsure of whether more of her company’s revenue will have to go for taxes.

“You don’t have a clue of what you can do,” said Donath, who runs Donath Communications, an advertising, marketing and design firm. “When you know what the rules of the game are, then you can play the game.”

source: money.cnn.com