Alternative Minimum Tax

February 2, 2010

Obama Proposes Higher Income Tax Rate For The Rich

President Obama and his administration are seeking almost a $1 trillion tax increase over the next decade on US taxpayers earning more than $200,000. He also wants to take an additional $400 billion from businesses even as it retools a proposed crackdown on international tax-avoidance techniques; according to a Feb 2, 2010 Business Week article.

Believe it or not, the Obama income tax proposal would actually reinstate income tax rates enacted by former President Bush 10 years ago. The income tax rates for single Americans making over $200,000 or joint filers earning more than $250,000 would increase to 36% and 39.6% respectfully. The plan also calls for eliminating preferences for oil and gas companies, life-insurance products, executives of investment partnerships and U.S.-based companies that operate overseas.

“This set of tax reforms strikes a balance between targeted tax cuts to spur investments in job growth and innovation here at home, middle-class tax relief to make our tax system more fair, measures to crack down on abuses that send jobs overseas, and long-term fiscal discipline,” Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said in a statement.

Obama’s proposed $143.4 billion in new tax cuts for individuals who earn under $200,000. While the budget sets out $93.5 billion in gross tax reductions for businesses, overall they would face a net tax increase.

“The proposed budget’s $300 billion in tax relief over the next 10 years for individuals, families, and businesses is mostly targeted and limited, often to people who don’t have to pay any taxes,” said Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa, the ranking Republican on the tax-writing Senate Finance Committee. “The tax increases in the budget dwarf the tax relief.”

President Obama asked Congress to extend all of Bush’s tax cuts that apply to Americans earning under $250,000. He also proposes almost doubling a tax credit that helps Americans pay for child care and increasing federal subsidies for Individual Retirement Accounts.

The budget assumes the federal estate tax, which expired Jan. 1 and was replaced with a capital-gains tax, will be reinstated retroactively with a 45 percent rate applied when married couples’ estates exceed $7 million. If Congress doesn’t act, the estate tax in 2011 will be reinstated to a 55 percent rate applied to estates valued at more than $1 million.

Obama’s budget also assumes Congress will continue to index the alternative minimum tax for inflation. The minimum tax can impose higher rates on families earning between $75,000 and $500,000 when their deductions are too high relative to their income. It was originally intended to affect only millionaires and is now ensnaring people with lower incomes because it was never indexed for inflation.

The Obama tax budget proposal will most certainly face opposition from Congress.  This proposal will also be opposed by the influential and wealthy US taxpayers.  Is Obama’s tax proposal political hari-kari?

source: businessweek.com

Filed under Taxes by

Permalink Print Comment

December 11, 2008

10 Super Things The IRS Can Do For You

In these troubling times we need all the help we can get.  But did you know the IRS may be able to help you during these economically challenging times?  Here are 10 things to know”. 

1. Recovery Rebate Credit: If you didn’t get an economic stimulus payment this past summer and didn’t file a tax return, you may be eligible for the Recovery Rebate Credit . See IRS.gov for details.

2. The Alternative Minimum Tax has been ‘PATCHED”. For 2008, the exemption amounts are $69,950 for married couples filing jointly and $46,200 for single individuals . More information is available at IRS.gov.

3. Cancellation of Debt income: If you have had or will have a home foreclosure, check out the tax rules at IRS.gov. Things may not be as bad as you think.

4. Commuting: If you ride your bike (bicycle) to work in 2009, it could be worth $20 a month, tax free from your employer. See IRS.gov. for more.

5. Deductions: The new additional standard deduction for non-itemizers can be as much as $500 or $1,000 if you are married, filing a joint return. Go to IRS.gov for details.

6. Election to Deduct Sate and Local General Sales Tax: You have an option when itemizing. Claim either State and local general sales taxes paid or state and local income taxes paid, but not both. IRS.gov has more.

7. Mileage: The standard mileage rate is changing from 59.5 to 55 cents per business mile as of Jan. 1, 2009. More information at IRS.gov.

8. Homebuyer Credit: The new “First Time Home Buyers Credit” is for a home purchased after April 8th, 2008 and before July 1st, 2009 and could be worth as much as $7,500. Do you qualify? See IRS.gov.

9. Residential Energy Property Credit: This credit has been re-instated for 2009 and is worth up $500 for up-grading your home with certain energy efficient items. See if you qualify at IRS.gov

10. Plug-in Electric Drive Motor Vehicle Credit: Buy a new plug-in electric car and get a credit of $2,500 or more. See IRS.gov about this today.
And one more for “tax credit”:

11. Record Keeping: Make sure you don’t omit or forget an item so you pay only the correct amount of tax - no more, no less. See IRS.gov for more details

source= az family

Filed under Taxes by

Permalink Print Comment

November 3, 2008

Is It The Obama or McCain Tax Plan - You Make The Call

I have been looking at the tax plans for both presidential candidates. I believe that both have good ideas and bad ideas. But it’s fair to say that we really don’t know if either of them will work.

It is true that Barack Obama’s plan is focused more on helping the “common man”, by providing tax relief to middle America - but at what expense?

Will a measly $1,000 a year really make the difference? How are we going to pay for it? The national deficit is growing at an alarming rate and additional tax cuts will just add to it.  This could have long term devastating effects on the economy and the value of the once “almighty dollar”.

On the other hand, John McCain’s tax plan calls for giving big business and the highest earners the larger tax cuts.  The “trickle down economics” of the republican plan doesn’t sit well with most Americans. But let’s be fair - it had worked in the past (some will obviously disagree).

So what is the right course to take on tax reform?  Everyone has ideas, but no one knows for sure.  I believe that giving the middle and lower classes a tax break can help the “psychology” of America.  It can help average folks feel like there is a future - that this economic crisis can be turned around.

The Obama plan calls for promoting and supporting domestic small businesses and that is great for America.  I believe that John McCain feels that same way, but he hasn’t really come across as the savior for the middle class.

I think both candidates agree that Alternative Minimum Tax must be eliminated. The tax reforms of 2001 expire in 2010 and AMT will tax more than 20 million Americans, if it is not changed.

John McCain’s plan calls for cutting the corporate tax rate to 25%, down 10% from the current 35%.  But will that only help big business?

Both candidates agree in health care reform. But again, it will cost trillions, yes trillions of dollars in the long run. Can we afford it - can we afford not to do it?

The bottom line is this: We won’t know what will work until a new president is elected,and the tax plan has time to mature.

I hate to say it - but most Americans want immediate gratification and middle class Americans deserve something to look forward to. The John McCain plan sounds great for big business and the wealthy - but what about the rest of us?

Filed under Taxes by

Permalink Print Comment

October 31, 2008

Palin Calls Obama’s Tax Plan “Phony”

According to CBS News, for the second day in a row, Sarah Palin focused the entirety of her attacks against Barack Obama on the Democratic nominee’s tax plan, rather than his personal associations.

“Just yesterday, we learned that America’s GDP actually fell in the third quarter of this year, and that confirms what we already know, and that’s that our economy right now is shrinking,” Palin said. “This is the worst possible time to raise taxes, but Barack Obama still wants to.”

Palin repeated her mantra that Obama has “an ideological commitment” that compels him to raise taxes.

“Now, his whole tax plan, really, it is, it’s so phony that it’s already starting to unravel, and we’re gonna call it the way that we see it,” she said.

Palin said that Obama’s definition of what constitutes the middle class seems to be evolving.

“And just this morning, Gov. Bill Richardson, a top surrogate for the Obama campaign, he who is working so hard to get Obama elected, Richardson said Obama’s tax plan would define middle class as $120,000 a year and under,” Palin said. “So now, we’re down to less than half the original income level and, just give it a little more time, and Barack Obama will be back to raising taxes on folks earning $42,000 a year.”

Appearing on KOAM radio this morning, Richardson said, “What Obama wants to do is he is basically looking at $120,000 and under among those that are in the middle class, and there is a tax cut for those,” according to a YouTube clip of the interview.

Richardson’s comments appear to have been a slip of the tongue, since the Obama campaign has not announced that it has changed its policy that everyone making less than $200,000 a year would get a tax cut and no one making under $250,000 a year would be burdened with a tax increase.

There seems to be a lot of confusion about the Obama-Palin Tax Plan. The true definition of the Obama tax plan appears to be elusive; it seems that everyone has a different opinion of exactly who will pay more, and who will pay under the democrat’s plan. Is it “fair and balanced”? It depends who you ask!

Filed under Taxes by

Permalink Print 1 Comment