Here we go again.  Another Barack Obama nominee, this time for Health and Human Services secretary, is being investigated for failing to pay back taxes.  Tom Daschle, the former South Dakota Senator waited nearly a month after being nominated before informing President Obama that he had not paid years of back taxes, according to the Washington Post.

Dashle paid  $140,000 in back taxes and interest on January 2, 2009 and a few days later informed the White House and Senate Finance Committee. 

Obama’s transition team discovered in December that $15,000 of the $276,000 in charitable contributions claimed by Daschle lacked proper documentation. But Daschle waited until after amended returns were filed before he mentioned the larger tax liability.

Daschle spokeswoman Jenny Backus said he had known since June 2008 that his luxury car and driver provided by wealthy Democratic donor, longtime friend and business associate Leo Hindery might be taxable, but never expected the amount to be such a “jaw-dropping” sum and “thought it was being taken care of” by his accountant.

Hindery founded InterMedia Partners, a private equity firm, in 1988. Daschle was paid $1 million annually for his consulting services, the Senate Finance Committee said.

Daschle had an unreported consulting income of $88,333, in 2007.

“Senator Daschle is embarrassed and disappointed by these errors,” Backus said. “He apologized for his part in these errors and expressed his deep regret that the committee had to devote time to them.”

The White House acknowledged Friday that Daschle had “some tax issues,” which, the administration said, have been resolved and should not bar his confirmation as secretary.

A statement issued by the White House affirmed that Daschle “is the right person to lead the fight for health care reform.”

“Senator Daschle brought these issues to the Finance Committee’s attention when he submitted his nomination forms and we are confident the committee is going to schedule a hearing for him very soon, and he will be confirmed,” it said.

Why is it that these high ranking politicians are trying to get away with paying taxes.  I mean $140,000 in taxes is by no means an oversight, how could it be?

And in Daschle’s case, he calculated his strategic moves in when to pay the back taxes and when to inform Obama and the Senate Finance Committee.  It is the same old political sleeze that we all hate.  This is very disturbing and brings up the point that maybe elected officials should be held accountable.

And Daschle’s sleezy moves won’t even affect his nomination.  This is a travesty – I don’t care how the constituents spin it.  If someone in the private sector owed $140,000 in federal taxes, do you think they would be treated the same? 

I see no excuse for this and Tom Daschle’s nomination should be voided.  Shame on you! Shame on government!

Something must be done!

According to CBS News, for the second day in a row, Sarah Palin focused the entirety of her attacks against Barack Obama on the Democratic nominee’s tax plan, rather than his personal associations.

“Just yesterday, we learned that America’s GDP actually fell in the third quarter of this year, and that confirms what we already know, and that’s that our economy right now is shrinking,” Palin said. “This is the worst possible time to raise taxes, but Barack Obama still wants to.”

Palin repeated her mantra that Obama has “an ideological commitment” that compels him to raise taxes.

“Now, his whole tax plan, really, it is, it’s so phony that it’s already starting to unravel, and we’re gonna call it the way that we see it,” she said.

Palin said that Obama’s definition of what constitutes the middle class seems to be evolving.

“And just this morning, Gov. Bill Richardson, a top surrogate for the Obama campaign, he who is working so hard to get Obama elected, Richardson said Obama’s tax plan would define middle class as $120,000 a year and under,” Palin said. “So now, we’re down to less than half the original income level and, just give it a little more time, and Barack Obama will be back to raising taxes on folks earning $42,000 a year.”

Appearing on KOAM radio this morning, Richardson said, “What Obama wants to do is he is basically looking at $120,000 and under among those that are in the middle class, and there is a tax cut for those,” according to a YouTube clip of the interview.

Richardson’s comments appear to have been a slip of the tongue, since the Obama campaign has not announced that it has changed its policy that everyone making less than $200,000 a year would get a tax cut and no one making under $250,000 a year would be burdened with a tax increase.

There seems to be a lot of confusion about the Obama-Palin Tax Plan. The true definition of the Obama tax plan appears to be elusive; it seems that everyone has a different opinion of exactly who will pay more, and who will pay under the democrat’s plan. Is it “fair and balanced”? It depends who you ask!

According to the Washington Post, new analysis by the Tax Policy Center, a joint project of the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution, Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain are both proposing tax plans that would result in cuts for most American families. Obama’s plan gives the biggest cuts to those who make the least, while McCain would give the largest cuts to the very wealthy. For the approximately 147,000 families that make up the top 0.1 percent of the income scale, the difference between the two plans is stark. While McCain offers a $269,364 tax cut, Obama would raise their taxes, on average, by $701,885 – a difference of nearly $1 million.

Here is your tax savings based on your annual earnings:

If you make…	Under McCain		Under Obama
Over $2.87 mil	-4.4%	$270,000	+11.5%	+702,000
$603,000 to $2.87 mil	-3.4%	$ 45,000	+ 8.7%	+116,000
$227,000 to $603,000	-3.1%	$  7,900	0.0%	-$      12
$160,000 to $227,000	-3.0%	$  4,380	- 1.9%	-$  2,790
$111,650 to $160,000	-2.5%	$  2,615	- 2.1%	-$  2,205
$ 66,355 to $111,650	- 1.4%	$  1,010	- 1.8%	-$  1,290
$ 37,595 to $ 66,355	- 0.7%	$    319	- 2.4%	-$  1,040
$ 18,980 to $ 37,595	- 0.5%	$    113	- 3.6%	-$    892
up to $18,980	- 0.2%	$      19	- 5.5%	-$    567
Average cut	- 2.0%	$ 1,195	- 0.3%	-$    160

*the numbers have been rounded