Experts were surprised when presidential candidate Rick Santorum released four years of tax returns this week.  Although he earned less than his republican rival Mitt Romney, he paid at a higher rate.

The details of his tax records showed that he and his wife Karen earned more than $3.7 million over the last four years (2007-2010) and paid almost one-quarter of it in income tax.

He made his millions as a corporate consultant and a media commentator after serving as Senator of Pennsylvania.  His earnings jumped from $600,000 in 2007 to $1.1 million in 2009. His 2010 tax return showed his income as $923,000.

In 2009, Santorum’s income tax rate was 28% while Mitt Romney only paid an effective income tax rate of 13.9% on earnings of about $27 million.

The release of Santorum’s tax returns could affect his campaign. During his campaign, Santorum has claimed to have close ties with middle-class blue collar Americans.

Expect to see Mitt Romney use Santorum’s tax records against him. He’ll try to label him as a “Washington insider” and not a friend of the working class.

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie’s proposal to cut  income taxes by ten percent will benefit the rich and not the middle class.

Christie’s plan would benefit taxpayers who pay a significantly higher income tax rate under the state’s current tax system.  But the plan doesn’t help middle-class who are struggling more with the property tax rate.

“We all want to cut taxes, but we want to cut the right taxes in ways that help those most in need and that provides the most benefit to the economy,” said Senator Paul Sarlo (D-Bergen), chairman of the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee, which conducted the first of many expected hearings Monday on the tax cut proposal.

Republicans argue that the Democrats are rebuking the proposal too quickly.

“Democrats cannot have a knee-jerk reaction,” State Sen. Kevin O’Toole (R-Essex) said. “History shows that it will create more income tax revenue, attract jobs and more opportunities.”

O’Toole noted that when former Gov. Christine Todd Whitman, also a Republican, cut income taxes in the 1990s, overall income tax revenue increased as the economy expanded, incomes rose and jobs were created.

Under the proposal, a family earning $50,000 a year would save $80.50, and those making $100,000 would save $275, according to David Rosen, budget and finance officer with OLS. Families who make $1 million would save $7,265, Rosen said.

The Office of Legislative Services also did an analysis of the taxes paid in 2004 and found that NJ taxpayers who made less than $200,000 paid a greater share of their income toward property taxes than income taxes.  For example, a family that makes $80,000 paid about 6 percent of its gross income for property taxes and about 1.6 for income taxes.

Based on the analysis, it seems unlikely that Cristie’s income tax cut proposal will win approval. Expect the Democrats to offer a counter proposal that would emphasize property tax cuts for the middle class.

President Obama and his administration are seeking almost a $1 trillion tax increase over the next decade on US taxpayers earning more than $200,000. He also wants to take an additional $400 billion from businesses even as it retools a proposed crackdown on international tax-avoidance techniques; according to a Feb 2, 2010 Business Week article.

Believe it or not, the Obama income tax proposal would actually reinstate income tax rates enacted by former President Bush 10 years ago. The income tax rates for single Americans making over $200,000 or joint filers earning more than $250,000 would increase to 36% and 39.6% respectfully. The plan also calls for eliminating preferences for oil and gas companies, life-insurance products, executives of investment partnerships and U.S.-based companies that operate overseas.

“This set of tax reforms strikes a balance between targeted tax cuts to spur investments in job growth and innovation here at home, middle-class tax relief to make our tax system more fair, measures to crack down on abuses that send jobs overseas, and long-term fiscal discipline,” Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said in a statement.

Obama’s proposed $143.4 billion in new tax cuts for individuals who earn under $200,000. While the budget sets out $93.5 billion in gross tax reductions for businesses, overall they would face a net tax increase.

“The proposed budget’s $300 billion in tax relief over the next 10 years for individuals, families, and businesses is mostly targeted and limited, often to people who don’t have to pay any taxes,” said Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa, the ranking Republican on the tax-writing Senate Finance Committee. “The tax increases in the budget dwarf the tax relief.”

President Obama asked Congress to extend all of Bush’s tax cuts that apply to Americans earning under $250,000. He also proposes almost doubling a tax credit that helps Americans pay for child care and increasing federal subsidies for Individual Retirement Accounts.

The budget assumes the federal estate tax, which expired Jan. 1 and was replaced with a capital-gains tax, will be reinstated retroactively with a 45 percent rate applied when married couples’ estates exceed $7 million. If Congress doesn’t act, the estate tax in 2011 will be reinstated to a 55 percent rate applied to estates valued at more than $1 million.

Obama’s budget also assumes Congress will continue to index the alternative minimum tax for inflation. The minimum tax can impose higher rates on families earning between $75,000 and $500,000 when their deductions are too high relative to their income. It was originally intended to affect only millionaires and is now ensnaring people with lower incomes because it was never indexed for inflation.

The Obama tax budget proposal will most certainly face opposition from Congress.  This proposal will also be opposed by the influential and wealthy US taxpayers.  Is Obama’s tax proposal political hari-kari?

source: businessweek.com