December 7, 2010
Bush Tax Cuts To All, And To Obama, Good Night
There’s good news for American taxpayers and bad news for the President and Democrats. Today, the President announced a tentative deal with the Republicans in Congress to extend the Bush era tax cuts at all income levels for two years. In return, the President secured Republican approval to keep benefits flowing to the long-term unemployed, cut payroll taxes for all workers for a year and take other steps to bolster the economy.
The tentative agreement highlights the chaos and strains that Mr. Obama faces in his own party as he plots a course between his desire to get things done and retreating on his own principles.
“It’s not perfect, but this compromise is an essential step on the road to recovery,” Mr. Obama said. “It will stop middle-class taxes from going up. It will spur our private sector to create millions of new jobs, and add momentum that our economy badly needs.”
The package would cost about $900 billion over the next two years, to be financed entirely by adding to the national debt, at a time when both parties are professing a desire to begin addressing the nation’s long-term fiscal imbalances.
The tentative deal would include the:
- Reduction of the 6.2 percent Social Security payroll tax on all wage earners by two percentage points for one year
- Continuation of a college-tuition tax credit for some families
- Expansion of the earned-income tax credit
- Provision to allow businesses to write off the cost of certain equipment purchases
- Top rate of 15 percent on capital gains and dividends would remain in place for two years
- Alternative minimum tax would be adjusted so that as many as 21 million households would not be hit by it
- Provision for a 13-month extension of jobless aid for the long-term unemployed
Perhaps the biggest concession by the President to the Republicans was on estate taxes. Mr. Obama agreed to a deal on the federal estate tax that allows an exemption of $5 million per person and a maximum rate of 35 percent. — a higher exemption and far lower rate than many Democrats wanted.
“The House Democrats have not signed off on any deal,” Representative Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, who has been representing House Democrats in formal negotiations on the tax issue, said Monday night. “We will thoroughly review and discuss the proposed package in the caucus.”
Some senior Democrats said an agreement by Mr. Obama to accede to Republican demands on the estate tax could lead to a revolt among lawmakers. Mr. Obama noted that he, too, still strongly disagreed with the Republican insistence on extending the tax breaks for the highest earners. “Ever since I started running for this office, I’ve said that we should only extend the tax cuts for the middle class,” he said, acknowledging that he had been thwarted in one of the chief goals of his presidency.
These major concessions by the President are substantial. They mark the beginning of a new trend – marked infighting between Obama and Democrats, increased compromise with Republicans on issues and less support by the American public.
And it’ll get worse. In January, the Republicans gain control of the House.
All politics aside, most Americans believe the extension of the Bush era tax cuts is essential to economy recovery - if just for the psychological lift it represents.
Source: nytimes.com
Filed under Taxes by
November 30, 2010
Congress Takes On Bush Tax Cuts and Expiring Tax Credits
With Congress back in session, Democratic and Republican congressional leaders will have to deal with the very important issues of the bush tax cuts and expiring tax credits.
Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois, the senate’s No. 2 Democrat, said negotiations over extending the Bush-era tax cuts also will include prolonging emergency unemployment benefits and other tax credits.
“I want to put a couple other things on the table,” Durbin said today on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “We do have unemployment running out,” he said, and “I also want to make sure the earned-income tax credit, the childcare tax credit, and the ‘Making Work Pay’ tax credit are part” of the discussion.
The Bush tax cuts, passed in 2001 and 2003 are set to expire on Dec. 31, 2010. President Obama will meet with Congress on Nov 30 to discuss the agenda.
Besides discussion on extending the tax cuts, Congress must decide what to do about unemployment benefits set to expire at the end of the month. The Labor Department estimates that more than 2 million Americans will lose unemployment benefits if Congress does not act.
Arizona Senator Jon Kyl, the chamber’s second-ranking Republican, said there is “an opportunity for us to sit down and negotiate a resolution to this that’s good for the economy.” Kyl also repeated a key sticking point for Republicans: “We don’t believe taxes should be increased on anyone.”
The President has argued the country can’t afford indefinitely extending tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, defined by the president as individuals making more than $200,000 and couples earning more than $250,000.
Obama on the Bush Tax Cuts
“I believe it is a mistake for us to borrow $700 billion to make tax cuts permanent for millionaires and billionaires,” Obama told reporters Nov. 14. “It won’t significantly boost the economy and it’s hugely expensive, so we can’t afford it.”
Republicans, who won a majority of House seats in the Nov. 2 elections and narrowed the Democratic margin in the Senate, are pushing to permanently extend all the current tax rates. While Obama has said he wants to permanently extend just the tax cuts on earnings up to $200,000 for individuals or $250,000 for households — about 97 percent of all taxpayers, according to the Internal Revenue Service — he has indicated he’s open to negotiations on achieving that goal.
“We should be focusing on what it takes to move this economy forward,” Durbin said. “We should not be worried about the discomfort of the wealthy.”
Expiring Legislation
Unless Congress acts, marginal rates will increase for all income-tax payers. Tax credits benefiting families will be cut in half. The so-called married penalty that forces some couples to pay more than if they were single will be reinstated. Rates will rise on most dividends and capital gains, and a levy on estates valued over $1 million will be resurrected.
“What’s likely to happen is there will be an extension of the tax cuts for everybody for a period of time,” Senator Byron Dorgan of North Dakota, a Democrat who is retiring, said in an interview today on CNN’s “State of the Union” program.
Extending only the current rates for individuals earning less than $200,000 and couples making under $250,000 would add more than $3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Sustaining tax cuts for those with higher incomes would add an additional $700 billion to the debt over the next decade, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has said.
An across-the-board extension of all Bush-era tax policies would cost the government about $5 trillion in foregone revenue and interest cost on the debt, the Congressional Research Service estimated last month.
With the Republicans taking control of the House in January, President Obama may have no choice but to negotiate and give in to resolve these issues.
Source: businessweek.com
Filed under Taxes by
March 4, 2009
Another Obama Cabinet Pick Has Tax Problems
President Barack Obama’s pick for U.S. trade representative is the fourth nominee to have tax issues. Former Dallas Mayor Ron Kirk will file amended tax returns for 2005 through 2007 and pay almost $10,000 in back taxes.
Ron Kirk’s tax problems stem from excess deductions for basketball tickets and failure to report speaking fees.
White House officials and key senators call the errors minor and predicted that the issue should Kirk’s nomination to be U.S trade representative.
“When you put anybody’s tax filings under a microscope, people don’t have to be dishonest,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. “It’s just hard to do all the right things. It certainly shouldn’t disqualify him.”
Senate Finance Committee aides uncovered Kirk’s tax issues during weeks of his examination and evaluation for the cabinet position. Kirk, a lawyer and the Texas Democratic Party’s 2002 Senate nominee, will file amended tax returns for the last three years and pay the Internal Revenue Service $9,975 plus interest.
This careless error pales in comparison to some other Obama Cabinet picks.
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner paid $43,000 in back taxes before his confirmation. Tom Daschle, the former Senate majority leader who withdrew his bid to lead the Health and Human Services Department, paid $128,203 in back taxes, plus interest, for failing to report as income the car and driver a friend had provided to him.
Labor Secretary Hilda Solis’ confirmation was delayed for weeks amid questions about her husband’s unpaid taxes. Outside the Cabinet, an Obama pick for a top White House job withdrew over questions about her tax compliance.
Texas Sen. John Cornyn, a member of the GOP leadership and the finance committee who defeated Kirk in the 2002 race, had been supportive of the nomination. But Monday night, an aide called the tax problems “a very serious offense.”
“He’s very disappointed,” Cornyn spokesman Kevin McLaughlin said. “He’s hopeful Mr. Kirk will take the opportunity to provide an explanation when he comes before the finance committee.”
The top Republican on the panel, Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa, “will reserve judgment on the nomination until the vetting process, including the hearing and any follow-up questions resulting from the hearing, is completed,” said spokeswoman Jill Gerber.
His tax bill includes three main discrepancies:
1. He owes $5,800 because of $37,750 in honorariums from 16 speeches dating to 2004. He assigned the fees to be paid directly to a scholarship fund at his alma mater, Austin College in Sherman. The Finance Committee said he should have reported the income and claimed a corresponding charitable deduction.
2. Kirk owes $2,600 stemming from deductions for season tickets to the NBA Dallas Mavericks: $6,208, $7,035 and $4,139 in 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
A memo issued by Democratic and GOP Finance Committee staffs said, however, that “he has substantiated $9,900 of the total $17,382 as qualifying entertainment expenses.”
3. An additional $1,000 in back taxes involved deductions for $25,218 in tax and accounting fees over three years. Kirk attributed 90 percent to his law practice, but that was too high.
Last October, Kirk also paid the IRS $2,188 plus $139 interest for tax year 2006, after the IRS notified him that he had failed to report a $5,000 speaking honorarium and $819 in dividend income.
Expect some tough questioning by members of Congress but the consensus is that Ron Kirk will be confirmed as the U.S. trade representative and join Obama’s cabinet.
Filed under Taxes by

