Taxpayers have a little more than a month to take advantage of the special 2010 opportunities for saving taxes with Roth Individual Retirement Accounts.

That’s because 2010 delivers special benefits to people who convert their IRAs into Roth IRAs.

Starting in 2010, all taxpayers, regardless of their income level, are allowed to move money from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. Before 2010, only people earning less than $100,000 could do that. Beware, the benefit expires at the end of this year, but many believe it will be extended along with a large portion of Bush tax cuts.

But another key benefit is now starting to make the Roth conversion seem even more attractive: That’s the one-time-only offer, good in 2010, to convert from a traditional IRA to a Roth and then spread the resulting tax burden over 2011 and 2012. As many Washington insiders expect income tax rates to remain the same for the next year or so, converts can take advantage by locking in relatively low tax rates on conversions and still defer the tax burden for a year or two.
More on Year-End Tax Tips: Saving Taxes With A Roth IRA

The 2010 tax season is over, but if your smart, you’re always thinking about next year’s taxes. This year has been bad for most businesses and experts predict this trend will continue. You can’t do much about the economy but you can take control of your taxes. So, here are some tax tips to consider for the 2010 tax year.

Estimated tax payments
As far as tax planning goes, knowing where you’ve been can help you get to where you want to go. This is especially true if you’re self-employed. In other words, seeing how you came out on your last tax return can alert you to changes you need to make to minimize your tax burden next time. For example, if you underpaid your estimated taxes and were assessed a penalty, or if you overpaid your taxes and got a huge refund, you should adjust your estimated tax payments for this year accordingly. Get on the ball now. The second installment of your estimated payments is due this month–June 15. To figure out how much you should be paying, talk to your tax professional.

Tax credits
Tax credits reduce your tax liability. Here are some to take advantage of.

Health-care reform
Small businesses and tax-exempt organizations can get tax relief offered in the new Small Business Health Care Tax Credit. Small businesses that have fewer than 25 full-time-equivalent employees with average wages of less than $50,000, and that pay at least half of individual health-care coverage costs, will be eligible for credits of up to 35 percent of their share of health-care premiums. This credit is retroactive to the beginning of 2010 and is in effect through 2013. Businesses with 10 full-time-equivalent employees making an annual average of less than $25,000 will receive the maximum credit. Those with more staff members with higher salaries will receive progressively less. Exactly how this credit will play out is yet to be seen; look for the “how-to” in claiming this credit.

Green Businesses
Businesses that make changes in their energy systems can get sizable federal tax credits. Installing a solar water heater, for example, could qualify a business for a tax credit of 30 percent of the cost. But a more significant incentive is the Energy Efficient Commercial Buildings Deduction. Although it is a deduction and not a dollar-for-dollar credit, there is still potential for saving big bucks. By modifying things such as lighting, HVAC systems and other parts of a building to improve energy efficiency, companies could qualify for a deduction of up to $1.80 per square foot of commercial building space. So the owner of a 100,000-square-foot building could receive a one-time, $180,000 federal tax deduction.

Work Opportunity Tax Credit
With so many unemployed people out there, if your business is in a position to hire, do it. You can get the Work Opportunity Tax Credit for hiring people who typically have a hard time finding and keeping gainful work, such as low-income ex-felons, disadvantaged youths and veterans, or those who receive food stamps or supplemental Social Security income benefits. The credit equals 40 percent of the first $6,000 of an employee’s wages for the first year of employment, as long as he or she has worked at least 180 days or at least 400 hours. The rate is 25 percent for fewer than 400 hours, but there’s no credit for an employee who works fewer than 120 hours. To qualify for the credit, you have to file a special form with the state workforce agency, which will certify that the worker is eligible for the credit.

Tax season is really never over and it makes business sense to think about tax planning throughout the year.

Are U.S. States unfairly burdening smokers by taxing cigarettes to cut budget deficits?  Historically, states have used part of the revenues from cigarette sales to help smokers quit or to pay for their health care. But now, many states are proposing an additional cigarette tax to bail them out of the fiscal crisis without earmarks to help people stop smoking.

Sure, smokers are an easy target. There is little political opposition and health advocacy groups consider it a bane to society.  But does it make it right? Are they being singled out?

In more than 20 states, budget shortfalls are pushing more to look to tobacco for revenue. Even the tobacco-producing states are considering it.

According to the New York Times, “in the South, where such taxes have been lower than in the rest of the country, Arkansas has nearly doubled its tax, to $1.15 a pack, and Kentucky’s will double, to 60 cents, on April 1.

Increases are also under consideration in other tobacco-growing states like North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia. With estimated state budget shortfalls nearing $50 billion, opponents of smoking see an opportunity to make headway with the most reluctant lawmakers.

A 10 percent increase in the price of cigarettes reduces consumption by 3 percent to 5 percent, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and deters young people from picking up the smoking habit.

Tobacco industry representatives have argued that tobacco taxes unfairly burden smokers, who are mostly working class or poor, and jeopardizes jobs at retailers like convenience stores, where more than 30 percent of total sales can come from cigarettes.

“Many of these states are asking the very definition of Main Street to bail out state capitals,” said Frank Lester, a spokesman for Reynolds American, which makes Camel and other major brands. “It’s just another bailout.”

States whose cigarette taxes are already high are also considering increases. In Oregon, now at $1.18 a pack, Gov. Theodore R. Kulongoski has proposed a 60-cent increase. In New Jersey, Gov. Jon Corzine is asking the Legislature for a 12.5-cent increase over the current $2.58. New York has the highest state tax on cigarettes, $2.75 a pack.

In Mississippi, cigarette tax increases in surrounding states have helped dampen fears that people would cross state lines to buy cigarettes. After a tax study commission appointed by Governor Barbour recommended an increase, he reversed his opposition but warned that the tax should be viewed as a matter of health policy, not a generator of revenue.

Bill Phelps, a spokesman for the Altria Group, the parent company of Philip Morris, argued that states often overestimated revenues from cigarette tax increases. From 2003 to 2007, there were 57 state tax increases, Mr. Phelps said, and in 41 cases they fell short of projections.

“We don’t think it makes a lot of sense to fund what are often important government programs with a revenue source that is in decline,” he said. “Just in the last 10 years, sales have declined an average 3 percent a year.”

But Frank J. Chaloupka, an economist and director of the Health Policy Center at the University of Illinois, Chicago, said cigarette taxes had not reached the threshold of diminishing returns. “We haven’t yet seen a case where if you raise taxes you don’t raise revenues,” Mr. Chaloupka said.

New Jersey did see a decline in revenue after its last tax increase, he said, but other factors, like a comprehensive smoke-free-air law that went into effect before the increase, drove down consumption.”

On top of all this, a 62-cent increase in the federal cigarette tax will go into effect in April.  The tobacco industry believes this will overburden smokers and drive down state collections. But the federal increase does not seem to have derailed state efforts, in part because smokers cannot avoid it by crossing state lines.

The debate will continue but the bottom line is that states will come down to the last day of the session, when they realize they have to get the budgets down and they need X dollars.”

What vice will be taxed next?  Beer, Wine, Liquor?

source: NY Times