November 3, 2008
Why We Need Obama And His Tax Plan
There are plenty of misunderstandings about the Obama Tax Plan. It’s time to lay out the facts and let the voters decide if the tax plan is in the best interest of America.
Before we do, it’s important to note that the Obama plan is all about giving middle and lower class Americans a tax break, which is approximately 95% of all Americans.
The John MCCain tax plan follows the tradition tax plans, giving the highest earners the biggest tax breaks, while providing little support to the middle and lower classes. We all now this as trickle down economics. The theory is that giving big business and the highest earners tax breaks, will trickle down to the average Joe, “no, not the average Joe Plumber”. Bush subscribes to this policy - has it worked?
Here is what the Barack Obama tax plan is proposing:
Raise taxes for those making over $250,000 a year
Let’s be realistic - they can afford it. Over the past eight years, the highest earners are the ones who have benefited from the Bush plan. They can afford health care, to buy a home, to maintain a home, to go on vacation and not have to worry about making ends meet every month. Even today, they are in much better shape, financially than most of America.
Increase the tax credit for low wage earners:
Barack is proposing to triple the amount of tax cuts for main street Americans. It sounds like a lot but in reality, it will barely be enough for us to get by. But his plan is going in the right direction.
Here are some comments about the Obama Tax Plan:
Rea Hederman Jr., a senior policy analyst at the conservative Heritage Foundation “said the middle class would likely pay less under Mr. Obama’s plan than Mr. McCain’s.” [NY Sun, 8/15/08]
Obama’s tax calculator is “a very simple gadget that’s the most useful thing I’ve seen on any political website in a while.” [Forbes.com, 10/08]
Cut taxes for the small business owners and those companies that keep jobs in America
How many people do you know have lost their jobs because big business has shipped the jobs overseas? I, for one, am directly affected by this - and I am still unemployed. I am angry that the big companies are looking for a profit and forgetting about their employees, some who gave their sweat and blood for 10 - to 20 years, only to be told - get out!
Now, I’m starting my own small business - and I’m excited about the prospects under Barack Obama’s tax plan. In order to compete globally, America must keep the jobs here and support our small businesses - we are capable of competing with anyone in world!
Here are a few more facts about Obama’s tax plan:
- Cut taxes for 95 percent of workers and their families with a tax cut of $500 for workers or $1,000 for working couples.
- Provide generous tax cuts for low- and middle-income seniors, homeowners, the uninsured, and families sending a child to college or looking to save and accumulate wealth.
- Eliminate capital gains taxes for small businesses, cut corporate taxes for firms that invest and create jobs in the United States, and provide tax credits to reduce the cost of healthcare and to reward investments in innovation.
- Dramatically simplify taxes by consolidating existing tax credits, eliminating the need for millions of senior citizens to file tax forms, and enabling as many as 40 million middle-class Americans to do their own taxes in less than five minutes without an accountant or tax advisor.
Tax Relief For Middle Class Families will include:
- A $1,000 Tax Credit
- A refundable $4,000 American Oppportunity Tax Credit
- A Universal 10% Mortgage Interest Tax Credit
- Elimate Income Taxes for Seniors Making Less than $50,000
- Expand retirement savings incentives
- Health Care Credits
- Expand the Earned Income Tax Credit
- Expanded Tax Credits for Clean Vehicle
- Simplify Tax System
Filed under Taxes by










Comments on Why We Need Obama And His Tax Plan »
Let’s be realistic - they can afford it
Want to really be realistic? They can also afford to avoid it. Congress’s stock in trade is selling manipulations of the revenue code to rich contributors, and this will remain the case for as long as we permit politicians to do so.
Every single “soak the rich” scheme that has ever been sold to the public has turned into a “soak everyone” scheme within a couple of years as we get inflated into those tax brackets.
Anyone making a million bucks a year and actually paying anything close to the nominal tax rate has an incompetent accountant.
Obama’s so-called plan is nothing but more of the same. He voted to inflate the currency by another $850 billion and give it to his financial-industry buddies. He is bought and paid for. If you expect him to do anything different, you will be sorely disappointed.
-jcr
You have an inncorrect view of our tax system to be buying into the Obama tax plan. Do your research next time and you will see the truth.
When it comes to the US tax system, the wealthy already pay an astonishingly disproportionate share of all tax revenues. Take, for example, the top two percent of all earners: this group pays an incredible 43.6% of all personal federal income taxes. Yes, you read that right: two percent carry nearly half the load.
Well, you might argue, if they make 43.6% of all income, then that seems reasonable. Not even close: the top two percent of all earners take in 24.1% of all income.
The bottom 50% of all earners contributes a mere 3.3% of all federal income taxes (while earning 13.4% of all income).
Let’s drill down a little further and look at the top five percent: Senator Obama has called on increasing the taxes on this group, and he has defined them as earning $250,000 or more per annum (since then, he’s adjusted that to $200,000 in a television ad; his running mate, Senator Joe Biden, uses $150,000). What do the numbers say about this group?
Well, Senator Biden is closer to the truth than Senator Obama: the top five percent of all earners make $137,056 a year. They currently contribute, wait for it, 57.1% of all federal income taxes. Can it truthfully be said they are not carrying their fair share?
Britain experimented with similar wealth-redistribution schemes in the ’70s: the top earners were subjected to a 90% (yes, ninety-percent!) tax rate. What happened as a result? They left the country and moved to other countries where taxes were not as high.